Wrike for Project Management

Wrike for Project Management



260710 Wrike Meeting Agenda

Date: 260710Time: 12:05 - 1:05 PM ESTLocation: Virtual

Attendees

  • Richard
  • Doris
  • Gregoire
  • Gibran
  • Nasim
  • Hugo
  • Rafael


Executive Summary

  • Wrike blueprint admin access remains restricted to a single gatekeeper (Richard) to maintain consistency and prevent user-error modifications.
  • Wrike timeline management rule established: Project coordination logs, phases, and sub-phases act as the strategic game plan (promises) and should not contain assigned names or dates during setup, while specific tasks act as the actual weekly to-do list that reports progress up to the phases.
  • Milestone features banned in Wrike Gantt charts because they create scheduling errors during updates; deadlines and deliverables must be entered as standard same-day tasks instead.
  • Future Wrike integration planned to track financial metrics and labor efforts by assigning hours and billing rates directly to tasks, which will automatically aggregate to project phases.
  • Next steps: Raphael to send a list of CA sub-phases (RP, field reports, closing documents) to Richard for template integration; Richard and Hugo to build out specific project game plans for the Markham, Durham, and EdmontonLaunch Pad projects.

Full Summary

Team Onboarding and Project Assignments

  • Doris introduced Raphael as the Calgary-based Contract Administration lead who will assist the team with Contract Administration forms and processes.
  • Hugo is currently being onboarded to the Launch Pad projects.
  • The initial assignments for Hugo will focus on Markham, Durham, and Edmonton.

Wrike System Architecture and Standards

  • Richard outlined the organizational structure of Wrike, which uses coordination logs, phases, sub-phases, and tasks to track projects.
  • The system allows up to nine contractual coordination logs to be individually imported into each project.
  • The project hierarchy must flow from coordination logs down to phases, then to sub-phases, and finally to individual tasks.
  • Richard plans to clear the preset placeholder dates from the blueprint templates because team members have been stretching phase timelines to hide schedule delays.
  • Workflows and assignments must follow strict configuration rules to maintain system integrity.
  • Coordination logs, phases, and sub-phases must use the default workflow, remain unassigned, and have no initial dates during project setup.
  • Individual tasks must use the task workflow and must always live under a sub-phase to ensure timelines aggregate correctly up the hierarchy.
  • Milestones should not be used in Wrike because they do not automatically update when dependencies change; instead, users should create a standard task with a single-day duration.
  • Richard recommends that each project folder should be configured with four distinct view tabs.
  • These tabs must include Table, Table Active (which filters out completed items), Gantt, and Gantt Active.

Progress Tracking and Future Features

  • The primary goal of the system is to manage a live to-do list against a strategic game plan to track plan creep.
  • When tasks extend past the planned sub-phase timeline, the timeline bar turns faded green to indicate a delay.
  • For fee-based projects, explicit timelines must be set on the phases, sub-phases, and logs, whereas hourly projects like Launch Pads can simply rely on automated aggregation.
  • In the future, Richard plans to incorporate task durations, user rates, and efforts to aggregate total fees and effort metrics against the coordination logs.
  • Effort is defined as a planning metric representing the total hours required to finish an item, which is distinct from actual daily timesheet reporting.

Administration, Access, and Project Game Plans

  • Following a discussion and vote, the team decided to maintain a gatekeeper system for blueprint administration rather than granting universal admin access.
  • Richard and Doris will remain the administrators responsible for importing blueprints into new project folders.
  • Raphael will send a list of CA-specific sub-phases to Richard to be added to the blueprint, including Request for Proposals, field reports, and closing documents.
  • The Sentinel project has been assigned the job number 2026-04, and the CA coordination log has been imported into it.
  • For the Crimson project, the IFC timeline was set from last September through July 31, 2027.
  • Game plans will be selectively applied depending on the project life cycle phase.
  • Richard and Hugo will map out game plans for active Launch Pad projects in Markham and Edmonton.
  • Revised game plans will be established for the two Glacier projects.
  • Projects nearing completion, including Tillotson, Chestermere, and Royal Oak, will not receive game plans and will focus solely on execution.

Meeting Notes

Attendees:
  • Richard
  • Doris
  • Nasim
  • Gibran
  • Gregoire
  • Hugo
  • Rafael
Agenda:
  • Richard to demo Wrike standards and expectation of using Wrike at DMA.
Meeting Notes:
  • Wrike
  • Custom fields have been setup, which can be seen as the available workflows.
  • Blueprints have been setup for use in the office. These blueprints are a project phase and can be automatically copied to a project.
  • Each Wrike project has a coordination log for each contractual phase of the project.
  • Coordination log can have multiple phases.
  • Coordination logs will template dates cleared.
  • Wrike is used to track and show to-do lists which we are able to compare against a plan.
  • When looking at a project or a log;
  • The Table tab shows any and all items.
  • The Table Active tab shows only items that are open / completed items hidden.
  • The coordination log, phase and sub-phase should not be assigned a date or assignee. Only individual tasks should be dated and assigned.
  • Each item in Wrike is assigned a workflow:
  • The Task workflow is for the individual tasks that are created. Tasks must also be placed within a sub-phase.
  • The Default Workflow is for Coordination Logs, phases & sub-phases only.
  • About the use of Gantt views:
  • Using the tasks only within sub-phases it allows for your Gantt chart for your project to automatically aggregate the item - we call this reporting up the time.
  • The bars that contain an effort are for planning and the software will show a coloured bar when things are overrun. This is used to show your project planning vs your actual performance.
  • Future projects will have fees input into the coordination logs as well so that we map financial performance against fees as well.
  • Current goal is to effectively plan time and effort within Wrike. This requires everyone to properly input tasks & properly assign dates for planning.
  • We should also create views in project when we see they do not have them:
  • Table
  • Table Active (All Active Items Only)
  • Gantt Chart
  • Gantt Chart Active (All Active Items Only)
  • Effort has several different modes, basic, flexible and auto. The effort is used to demark the expected amount of time it takes to complete an item.
  • Planning dates go into coordination logs and phases in order to compare actual performance.